Tuesday, March 2, 2021

Hank Aaron V. Mike Trout - $36 Million

TRIVIA WINNER: Congrats to Robert Ewing of Jerome, PA who correctly identified Bob Lemon as the seven-time 20-game winner on the Indians the season Herb Score was injured. The Prize: Starbucks Gift Card.

NEW TRIVIA CONTEST:  By answering the TRIVIA QUESTION CORRECTLY you are automatically entered into a weekly drawing for a Starbucks Gift Card.  YOU MUST ENTER VIA THE EMAIL AT THE END OF THIS COLUMN. Don't forget to put your mailing address in with the answer so if you win we can send you the gift card in the mail.

NEW TRIVIA QUESTION: While Hank Aaron finished 3rd in the 1963 MVP voting and Willie Mays finished 5th, the Dodgers Sandy Koufax won the Award. There were three other Dodgers who finished in the Top 10 of the voting. Who were they?  
ANSWER to the Trivia question in the previous column:  Bob Lemon was
the seven-time 20-game winner on the Indians the season Herb Score was injured.

To say Hank Aaron and Willie Mays were grossly underpaid is an unbelievable understatement. In the era when Pete Rose wanted to be the "first $100,000 singles hitter," it begs the question; if Aaron were in his prime today, how much would he be worth as a Free Agent. His best season of the 1960s was arguably 1963.

I once asked Aaron during a one-on-one interview at UPI Radio, "could an MLB team even pay Henry Aaron today?" He smiled politely and said "they would find the money."


In 1963, Hamerin' Hank led the league in several hitting categories and was an outstanding defensive player who had his highest Stolen Base total of his career. In 161 of his teams 162 games he scored 121 Runs and drove in another 130. He hit 44 Home Runs and batted .319. He also stole 31 bases. He was atop of the NL in Slugging Percentage, OPS and Total Bases. Aaron collected 201 hits and there were 29 doubles mixed in. As for Run Production; Total runs accounted for minus Home Runs; 207!** The entire Braves team only accounted for 1162 which means Aaron was worth almost 20-percent of the teams run production. Aaron finished third in the MVP race for a club which finished sixth in the standings. For this he was paid $53,000. 

The most comparable player today, based on a full season, is the Angels Mike Trout. In 2019, a good comparison year, Trout nearly matched Aaron in every category. He played in fewer games at 134 but hit 27 doubles, 45 homers, drove in 103 and scored 110 while batting .291. He topped the AL in On Base Percentage, Slugging Percentage and OPS while also leading the league by drawing 14 Intentional Walks. Wherein Aaron finished third in the MVP, Trout won the Award. Their fielding averages were also close with Trout leading Aaron .987-.979. But his Run Production was only 168 compared to Aaron's 207. However, he played in 27 fewer games.

A big difference is that Aaron walked less and struck out less. Aaron never struck out 100 times in a season, topping out at 97 and that was rare. Trout on the other hand, has only struck less than 100 times, once. His low was 90. During those 100-K years, Trout averaged 142 punch-outs.

The numbers were amazingly similar at nearly the same age. Aaron was 29, Trout 27. While Aaron barely made over $50-grand, Trout was paid $36 million dollars! So to answer the question of what Henry Aaron would be making in salary if he were playing in his Prime today; in the range of $36-$40 million dollars a season and the sky would be the limit. He never made more than $240,000. Trout made more than twice that as a Rookie!

There are of course other factors which would be involved but based on the strict numbers it's fair to say in 2021 and beyond a $40-million dollar a year salary would not be out of the question for the great Henry Aaron.

**- This statistic is created by adding the total number of Runs a player scored plus the total number of RBI, then subtracting the number of Home Runs since a player gets both an RBI and Run Scored with a Home Run.

TRIVIA CONTEST; After reading this column you can enter the weekly trivia contest for a chance to win a Starbucks Gift Card. Enter via the following email. Send 1) your answer to the trivia question at the top of the column, 2) your name, address and email so where we know where to send the card if you win 3) any comment you have on the column. One winner will be selected at random each week based on correct answers with the odds being based on the number of correct entries.  Please cut and paste or enter the following email into your email system.
                             SEND YOUR ANSWERS TO;  
Need to get out of a baseball hitting slump, or a golf swing slump? Order my new book "Beating the Slump; An athlete's guide to a better career." See it on Amazon for only $5.99. That is for the Paperback, you can also order Kindle on that link. You can also order paperback copies directly from me via the email below for my other books.

You can get a signed paper back copy of the above book "Tales of My Baseball Youth - a child of the sixties"  for $15 Shipping Included 
Use PayPal to or contact us at the same email for other payment. 

Thank you to those of you who purchased my book after reading this column. 




  1. The comparison, based on numbers, seems fair, but it's hard to get a legitimate read on today's players. Ever since the mid-1980's on, Performance Enhancing Drugs have skewed statistics. The inability of starting pitchers to complete games has also had an impact. The game is so full of fraud today that I lost almost all interest in it since the fraudulent home run race between McGuire and Sosa. If the PED's could be completely eliminated, a lot of the players in today's game would never make it to the big leagues.

    1. I agree to a point. I think the PED situation has been not entirely eliminated but cut down drastically, although we'll probably never get back to total zero. Then again tomorrow we may read some slugger got caught. A lot of times it's the lesser players rather than the major players, the guys needing that edge to continue pitching etc. Still sad.

  2. I'm not slamming Trout by any means. I think he is in any discussion for the all-time top 3 or 5 or 10 - Whatever number you'd want to go with, he's legitimately a candidate. To me, there's something to be said for Aaron playing 161 games versus Trout playing 134. Trout's 2019 beats Aarons 1963 in per-game numbers, but he also had 27 less games to do ANYTHING to help his team. Did he hit a 3rd home run in a game against my pitiful Tigers that the Angels already were leading by 7 or 8? How many of those 27 were close losses that they may have won with their star in the lineup?

  3. Good points all around, especially with the notion of not being around for so many games which for a player of his caliber, hurts his club. I did not check on his injury situation that season so that may have been a factor.